JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)December 12, 2000

A- de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Fabio Morón Díaz

✓Claimant Jose Alberto Bohorquez Gonzalez

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Presidente De La Republica
  • Exceso en la potestad reglamentaria
  • Incompetencia para introducir modificaciones al decreto de tutela en materia de competencias
4 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se ordenó inaplicar el numeral 2 del Art. 1º del Decreto 1382 del 2000 por ser inconstitucional.

En este orden de ideas, se resolvió el conflicto de competencias planteado entre el Tribunal Administrativo de Santander y la Corte Suprema de Justicia, Sala Civil, en el sentido de remitir el expediente a la primera de las citadas Corporaciones, para que resuelva de fondo la acción de tutela de la referencia, de conformidad con lo dispuesto en el Art. 86 de la C.P. y el Art. 37 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. R E S U E L V E:
  2. En el presente caso, INAPLICAR por inconstitucional el numeral 2 del artículo 1º del Decreto 1382 del 2000. En consecuencia, remítase el expediente al Tribunal Administrativo de Santander, para que asuma el conocimiento de la acción de tutela instaurada por el ciudadano JOSE ALBERTO BOHORQUEZ GONZALEZ, contra la el Tribunal Administrativo de Santander y la Corte Suprema de Justicia, Sala Civil del Tribunal Superior de Bucaramanga..
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.